08 Sep 2011, 01:37
Yeah good idea. I remember 2006, and the contract negotiations were already implementing the spots in Grand Tours. And also the calendars for the riders, indeed.
There should be some realistics in it, though. If you don't have enough riders wanting to compete in a certain part of the season, the wishes to take part in a course should not have that much effect on the morale, I feel. And also, if you want a rider to race another race than the one he was asking for but at about the same time, it should depend on the rider's goals in that race whether or not he will feel you let him down.
By the way, I fell the calendar should, as in 2006, only be possible for World Tour Teams, for ProContinental riders can't be sure of the races their team is invited for.
A minor comment on something above. I played 2006 and 2007 as well, but can't remember the riders told me their desired calendars in 2007. Conveniently forgotten by me, different versions, or another explanation?
Anyways, calendars can make a come back when you ask me
PS: You can even think about the following (which links to one of my earlier suggestions for improvements). If a rider asks for a program of about 90 days of racing, his race fitness should decline after those 90 days, not alreday at 60!
Take a sprinter, they can easily handle 80-90 race days a year, only the three Grand Tours already costs Mark Cavendish about 50 race days per year.
Improving the management part of the game. That's what we want to see, instead of better graphics that are only available for 'super'computers...